#Colormunki display vs spyder 3 pro pro#
What I'm wondering is if I would be better off getting the i1 Display Pro for now to profile the iMac monitor and, if need be, deal with getting hardware for printer calibration at a later date or if the X-Rite ColorMunki Photo will perform both tasks well. 2i had in the other hand better consistent result for monitor calibration than the spider3, that was not bad at all, but a bit of red in the gray vs the perfect neutral gray from the colormunki. With some papers the canned icc profiles work fine and with others, not so much. Home Forums Help and Support Spyder 3 Pro vs X-Rite ColorMunki Display This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 10 months ago by Florian Hch. 1i had both and have tested both personnaly, the spider3 studio box is better than the colormunki for profile creation for sure. The X-Rite ColorMunki Display device introduced in mid-2011 is not. For printing I've used manufacturer provided profiles to print with an Epson 3800. The NEC SpectraSensor Pro is based on the X-Rite iOneDisplay Pro sensor and is supported. Datacolor SPYDER 3 Pro Computer Monitor Display Calibration for Photography NEW. In the past I have been using a Sypder 2 for monitor profiling. ColorMunki Smile X-Rite Pantone Simple Monitor Calibration for Windows. Any feedback regarding the differences between the i! Display Pro and the Munki as regards the quality of display calibration and any information on the quality of paper profiles gotten from the Munki Photo would be greatly appreciated. I am trying to decide whether to get the i1 Display Pro to calibrate the iMac monitor or whether to go with the X-Rite ColorMunki Photo in order to also be able to make my own profiles for printing. Having recently upgraded to a 27" iMac I am in need of a new calibration set up.
0 kommentar(er)
